|
|
- The feasibility, repeatability, validity and responsiveness of the EQ . . .
EQ-5D-3L utility was significantly associated with stroke severity at all timepoints Convergent validity with BI was strong overall and for shared subscales EQ-5D-3L was moderately responsive to both improvement Cohen’s D 0 55 (95% CI:0 15—0 94) and deterioration 0 92 (95% CI:0 29—1 55)
- Health-related quality of life in stroke survivors: a 5-year follow-up . . .
Our mean EQ-5D-3L index was higher than the 0 73 (SD 0 27) reported in a prior study of 207 British stroke survivors at 60 months after a minor stroke (defined as a NIHSS score of 0–3) The British study consisted of younger subjects (mean age of 67 7 years) and had a lower proportion of women (37%)
- DOI 1 0. 1007 s 1 1 1 36-0 15-11 96-z W CrossMark - JSTOR
The classic three-level version of the EQ-5D, the EQ-5D-3L, has been investigated in stroke trials and showed good psychometric properties, including stable test-retest reliability [14, 18], acceptable construct validity, and concurrent validity [15-18] A five-level version of the EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) was recently developed by the EuroQoL
- Comparing responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L and EQ VAS in stroke . . .
To date, evidence to support the construct validity of the EQ-5D-5L has primarily focused on cross-sectional data The aims of this study were to examine the responsiveness of EQ-5D-5L in patients with stroke and to compare it with responsiveness of EQ-5D-3L and visual analogue scale (EQ VAS)
- Comparing the EQ-5D-5L and stroke impact scale 2. 0 in stroke patients . . .
The feasibility of the EQ-5D-5L is determined as good (completion rate: 96 4–96 6%, ≥ one item missing: 3 2 − 3 3%), whereas the SIS 2 0 is moderately feasible (overall completion rate: 44 9–46 1%, ≥ one item missing in domains: 4 7 − 28 7%)
- of the EQ-5D-5L, Comparing responsiveness VAS in stroke patients
EQ-5D-5L index is scored according to crosswalk approach, the EQ-5D-3L index appears to be more responsive in stroke population The EQ-5D is a standardized preference-based measure of health that provides a simple, generic measure for clinical and economic assessment [1, 2]
- EQ-5D-5L User Guide - EuroQol
1 3 EQ-5D-3L The EQ-5D three-level (3L) version was introduced in 1990 The standard paper-based, self-complete version consists of a title page, the descriptive system (on page 2), and the EQ VAS (on page 3) The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions, each describ-ing a different aspect of health: MOBILITY,
- Minimal Clinically Important Difference in EQ-5D: We Can Calculate it . . .
The smallest difference in score in the domain of interest which patients perceive as beneficial and which would mandate, in the absence of troublesome side effects and
- Longitudinal study of patients’ health-related quality of life using EQ . . .
Primary and secondary outcome measures Proportions of problems reported in the five EQ-5D-3L dimensions, EQ VAS scores of participants’ own health and proportions of participants and mean median EQ VAS score in the Paretian Classification of Health Change (PCHC) categories
- Comparing responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L and EQ VAS in stroke . . .
In general, EQ-5D-3L index appeared to be more responsive (ES 0 63-0 82; SRM 0 77-1 06) and EQ VAS less responsive (ES 0 51-0 65; SRM 0 59-0 69) than EQ-5D-5L index The EQ-5D-5L index, based on the crosswalk value set, seems to be appropriately responsive in patients with stroke, 4 months after disease onset
|
|
英文每年常用名排名
2023 年排名
2022 年排名
2021 年排名
2020 年排名
2019 年排名
2018 年排名
2017 年排名
2016 年排名
2015 年排名
2014 年排名
2013 年排名
2012 年排名
2011 年排名
2010 年排名
2009 年排名
2008 年排名
2007 年排名
2006 年排名
2005 年排名
2004 年排名
2003 年排名
2002 年排名
2001 年排名
2000 年排名
英文名字起源
希伯来
希腊
条顿
印度
拉丁
拉丁语
古英语
英格兰
阿拉伯
法国
盖尔
英语
匈牙利
凯尔特
西班牙
居尔特
非洲
美洲土著
挪威
德国
威尔士
斯拉夫民族
古德语
爱尔兰
波斯
古法语
盎格鲁撒克逊
意大利
盖尔语
未知
夏威夷
中古英语
梵语
苏格兰
俄罗斯
土耳其
捷克
希腊;拉丁
斯干那维亚
瑞典
波兰
乌干达
拉丁;条顿
巴斯克语
亚拉姆
亚美尼亚
斯拉夫语
斯堪地纳维亚
越南
荷兰
|