|
|
- Iran’s Shifting Discourse on Nuclear Weaponization:
Heightening Threat Perception is the Main Driver of a Discourse Shift: Iran’s rhetoric shift toward nuclear armament is largely driven by external pressures, including Israel’s ongoing war on Gaza, and the wider region, along with its nuclear capabilities, and the limits of Iran’s conventional deterrence capabilities
- (PDF) Iran’s Rhetoric Aggression: Instrumentalizing Foreign . . .
This research explores how Iran has mediated its foreign policy instrument of rhetoric aggression to project its power, protect its self-constituted image abroad, deflect attacks on Shi’ism
- Rhetoric versus Reality: Iranian Threat Perception and The . . .
Overall, Iran is perceived to pose a threat to the international community for three reasons: its nuclear proliferation efforts, its resistance to American pressures and its alleged regional bellicosity
- Continuity or Change: Iran’s Diplomatic Rhetoric at the . . .
Iran’s vocal support for the Palestinian cause is a cornerstone of its foreign policy, with leaders frequently denouncing Israeli occupation and calling for Palestinian self-determination Iran positions itself as the main opposition to Israel in the region, criticizing what it views as Western complicity in Israeli actions
- Iran’s nuclear ambitions: the fine line between balancing . . .
Despite its flaws, the agreement provided a diplomatic framework that aimed to halt Iran’s nuclear advancements and build trust over time, although it might result in being not enough as a deterrence Trustability remains a major obstacle, between foreign actors, but also among its own citizens
- 4 ways Tehran could retaliate after U. S. strikes on Iran’s . . .
Iran insists its program is peaceful, though it is the only non-nuclear-armed state to enrich uranium up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%
- Debate: Pros and Cons for Military Intervention in Iran
In June 2025, Israel and the United States launched devastating military strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities The attacks represent one of the most consequential foreign policy decisions of the 21st century In a sense, this was the culmination of over 50 years of nuclear ambition, revolution, and geopolitical conflict The strikes destroyed key facilities at
|
|
英文每年常用名排名
2023 年排名
2022 年排名
2021 年排名
2020 年排名
2019 年排名
2018 年排名
2017 年排名
2016 年排名
2015 年排名
2014 年排名
2013 年排名
2012 年排名
2011 年排名
2010 年排名
2009 年排名
2008 年排名
2007 年排名
2006 年排名
2005 年排名
2004 年排名
2003 年排名
2002 年排名
2001 年排名
2000 年排名
英文名字起源
希伯来
希腊
条顿
印度
拉丁
拉丁语
古英语
英格兰
阿拉伯
法国
盖尔
英语
匈牙利
凯尔特
西班牙
居尔特
非洲
美洲土著
挪威
德国
威尔士
斯拉夫民族
古德语
爱尔兰
波斯
古法语
盎格鲁撒克逊
意大利
盖尔语
未知
夏威夷
中古英语
梵语
苏格兰
俄罗斯
土耳其
捷克
希腊;拉丁
斯干那维亚
瑞典
波兰
乌干达
拉丁;条顿
巴斯克语
亚拉姆
亚美尼亚
斯拉夫语
斯堪地纳维亚
越南
荷兰
|